Expandable vs Static Interbody Devices for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-1-2022
Publication Title
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Abstract
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has paved a way for minimally invasive surgical treatment of a wide variety of spine pathologies. Interbody devices are used to stabilize painful disc levels, provide indirect decompression of neural elements, correct deformity, restore lordosis, and provide a sound durable fusion. Through the years, new static and expandable interbody devices have been developed in an attempt to improve radiographic and clinical outcomes in lumbar spine surgery. The purpose of this article is to explore the advantages and disadvantages between static and expandable interbody devices when used in LLIF. Specifically, this article addresses the differences in subsidence, indirect decompression, restoration of lumbar lordosis, complications, patient-reported outcomes, and cost between static and expandable interbody devices.
Volume
16
Issue
S1
First Page
53
Last Page
60
Recommended Citation
Zakko P, Whaley JD, Preston G, Park DK. Expandable vs static interbody devices for lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Apr;16(S1):S53-S60. doi: 10.14444/8236. PMID: 35387889.
DOI
10.14444/8236
ISSN
2211-4599
PubMed ID
35387889