Files
Download Full Text (3.3 MB)
Description
INTRODUCTION
Research reveals that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) rarely leads to prolonged survival in patients with chronic illnesses in whom death is expected in the relative near-term. There is strong ethical consensus favoring a physician’s right to refuse to provide CPR when it is physiologically futile or medically inappropriate. State laws governing medical treatment, however, sometimes diverge from this guidance. This study examines laws related to life sustaining treatment, analyzing both physician and surrogate authority in decision making about resuscitation orders in the national context.
Publication Date
5-2-2022
Keywords
Medical Ethics, End of Life Care
Disciplines
Bioethics and Medical Ethics | Pediatrics
Recommended Citation
VanDusen H, Wasserman JA. The divergence of medical ethics and state laws regarding life sustaining treatment. Poster presented at: Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine Embark Capstone Colloquium; 2022 May 2; Rochester Hills, MI.
Comments
The Embark Capstone Colloquium at the Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester Hills, MI, May 2, 2022.