Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in continuous flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from ELECTRAM Investigators.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-31-2020
Publication Title
J Atr Fibrillation
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) continues to augment left ventricular remodeling in patients with the continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD) remains unclear.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all clinical studies examining the role of continued CRT in end-stage heart failure patients with cf-LVAD reporting all-cause mortality, ventricular arrhythmias, and ICD shocks. Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio (RR) random-effects model was used to summarize data.
RESULTS: Eight studies (7 retrospective and 1 randomized) with a total of 1,208 unique patients met inclusion criteria. There was no difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.86 - 1.35, p = 0.51, I2=0%), all-cause hospitalization (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.76-1.34, p = 0.95, I
CONCLUSIONS: CRT was not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality or increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and ICD shocks compared to non-CRT in cf-LVAD patients. It remains to be determined which subgroup of cf-LVAD patients benefit from CRT. The findings of our study are intriguing, and therefore, larger studies in a randomized prospective manner should be undertaken to address this specifically.
Volume
13
Issue
4
First Page
2441
Last Page
2441
Recommended Citation
Shah K, Karpe V, K Turagam M, Shah M, Natale A, Gopinathannair R, Lakkireddy D, Garg J. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in continuous flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from ELECTRAM Investigators. J Atr Fibrillation. 2020 Dec 31;13(4):2441. doi: 10.4022/jafib.2441. PMID: 34950326; PMCID: PMC8691299.
DOI
10.4022/jafib.2441.
ISSN
1941-6911
PubMed ID
34950326